buhle











Project 1&2

Rubric

Casey-How symbols evolve through time; vampire

 

Criteria Exemplary (3) Good (2) Acceptable (1) Points awarded

 

Purpose

The writer’s central purpose or

argument is readily apparent to

the reader

The writing has a clear purpose or

argument, but may sometimes

Digress from it.

The central purpose or argument

is not consistently clear

throughout the paper

 

3

 

Content

 

Balanced presentation of relevant and legitimate information that clearly supports a central purpose or

Argument and shows a thoughtful, in-depth analysis of a significant topic. Reader gains important insights

Information provides reasonable

support for a central purpose or

argument and displays evidence of

a basic analysis of a significant

Topic. Reader gains some insights

Information supports a central

Purpose or argument at times.

Analysis is basic or general.

Reader gains few insights.

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

Organization/

Development of ideas

The ideas are arranged logically to support the purpose or Argument. They flow smoothly from one to another and are clearly linked to each other.

The reader can follow the line of reasoning.

The ideas are arranged logically to

Support the central purpose or argument. They are usually clearly linked to each other. For the most part, the reader can

Follow the line of reasoning.

In general, the writing is

arranged logically, although

occasionally ideas fail to make

Sense together. The reader is

fairly clear about what writer

Intends.

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

Feel

The writing is compelling. It

hooks the reader and sustains

Interest throughout.

The writing is generally engaging,

But has some dry spots. In general,

it is focused and keeps the reader’s

Attention.

The writing is dull and

Un engaging. Though the paper has some interesting parts, the

reader finds it difficult to

Maintain interest.

 

 

 

2

 

Tone and word choice

The tone is consistently

Professional and word choice is precise and concise

The tone is generally professional.  Word choice is generally good.

The writer often goes beyond the

generic word to

The tone is not consistently is merely adequate,

and the range of words are

Limited.

 

 

 

2

 

Writing mechanism

(grammar, spelling, etc)

The writing is free or almost free of errors. There are occasional errors, but

They don’t represent a major distraction or obscure meaning.

The writing has many errors, and the reader is distracted by them

 

 

2

 

Use of references, quality and citation

Compelling evidence from professionally legitimate sources is given to support

Claims. Attribution is clear and fairly represented.

Professionally legitimate sources

that support claims are generally

present and attribution is, for the

Most part, clear and fairly represented.

Although attributions are

occasionally given, many

Although attributions are

occasionally given, many

Statements seem unsubstantiated. The reader is confused about the source of information and ideas

 

 

 

2

 

 

  1. Clearly defines her thesis statement and her first quote captured my attention by wondering If its possible and gave the edge to really find out what was to follow.
  2. She has a few references, in which I hope she increases them then the paper would have a better content.
  3. When I was reading your paper I noticed that there was a good flow of ideas and the question that came into my head you answered it in the following paragraph.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Andrew-linguistic determinism, power and access

Criteria Exemplary (3) Good (2) Acceptable (1) Points awarded

 

Purpose

The writer’s central purpose or

argument is readily apparent to

the reader

The writing has a clear purpose or

argument, but may sometimes

Digress from it.

The central purpose or argument

is not consistently clear

throughout the paper

 

3

 

Content

 

Balanced presentation of relevant and legitimate information that clearly supports a central purpose or

Argument and shows a thoughtful, in-depth analysis of a significant topic. Reader gains important insights

Information provides reasonable

support for a central purpose or

argument and displays evidence of

a basic analysis of a significant

Topic. Reader gains some insights

Information supports a central

Purpose or argument at times.

Analysis is basic or general.

Reader gains few insights.

 

 

 

 

3

 

Organization/

Development of ideas

The ideas are arranged logically to support the purpose or Argument. They flow smoothly from one to another and are clearly linked to each other.

The reader can follow the line of reasoning.

The ideas are arranged logically to

Support the central purpose or argument. They are usually clearly linked to each other. For the most part, the reader can

Follow the line of reasoning.

In general, the writing is

arranged logically, although

occasionally ideas fail to make

Sense together. The reader is

fairly clear about what writer

Intends.

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

Feel

The writing is compelling. It

hooks the reader and sustains

Interest throughout.

The writing is generally engaging,

But has some dry spots. In general,

it is focused and keeps the reader’s

Attention.

The writing is dull and

Un engaging. Though the paper has some interesting parts, the

reader finds it difficult to

Maintain interest.

 

 

 

 

2

 

Tone and word choice

The tone is consistently

Professional and word choice is precise and concise

The tone is generally professional. Word choice Word choice is generally good.

The writer often goes beyond the

generic word to

The tone is not consistently is merely adequate,

and the range of words are

Limited.

 

 

 

3

 

Writing mechanism

(grammar, spelling, etc)

The writing is free or almost free of errors. There are occasional errors, but

They don’t represent a major distraction or obscure meaning.

The writing has many errors, and the reader is distracted by them

 

 

3

 

Use of references, quality and citation

Compelling evidence from professionally legitimate sources is given to support

Claims. Attribution is clear and fairly represented.

Professionally legitimate sources

that support claims are generally

present and attribution is, for the

most part, clear and fairly represented.

Although attributions are

occasionally given, many

Although attributions are

occasionally given, many

Statements seem unsubstantiated. The reader is confused about the source of information and ideas

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

  1. Found the study educative and insightful

-The use of quotations were well analyzed and interpreted

  1. The use of more references would enhance the specification of the use of terms bitch and    nigga
  2. When I was reading the paper I found out that the questions I asked myself were answered as the paper was being read. It shows the clarity and conciseness of the flow of the study
Advertisements


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

et cetera
%d bloggers like this: